@malibudailynews

- 63 days ago

@ABC7: Walmart warning: CEO says retailer will close its stores if rampant theft doesn't stop. How SoCal is cracking down. Now on ABC7 https://t.co/sUOc4co7Dc
h J R
@malibudailynews

- 72 days ago

@drrondahampton 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
h J R
@malibudailynews

- 92 days ago

@ceceswoods: PLAYBACK - yesterday’s show with @HesherMedia & I w/ Chief (ret.) @LASDJordan talking #elections2022 @LACoSheriff video asking deputies for donations, what CA ballots look like & more! https://t.co/VTlFEwynKc https://t.co/1dEqrSNEt6 https://t.co/pFNX6p7jbo
h J R
@malibudailynews

- 114 days ago

@ceceswoods: @HesherMedia aka #zztopoftalkradio & I are LIVE on @tntradiolive at the top of the hour. Still unpacking the dirty details of the #LACityCouncil audio leaks, their affects on other NOV 8 races, @AOC hecklers video that went viral and more! 10 AM PT/1 PM ET https://t.co/NSwUn5bEpJ https://t.co/f1NXkPFnLW
h J R
@malibudailynews

- 115 days ago

@LASDJordan: What’s to investigate? Tammany Hall West, aka #LosAngeles has nothing to hide! This is Old Political Elites vs. the Newbies. #LACity #LATimes #LADailyNews #LASD #LAPD https://t.co/DFdZO0ZOEv
h J R
Silverstein Exonerated – Council Members Mikke Pierson, Karen Farrer, Paul Grisanti Hide Report from Constituents
Breaking News, City, News, Politics

Silverstein Exonerated – Council Members Mikke Pierson, Karen Farrer, Paul Grisanti Hide Report from Constituents

By Sam Hall Kaplan
The independent investigation funded by Malibu prompted by former City Manager Reva Feldman claiming harassment by Councilperson Bruce Silverstein apparently has exonerated him, stupefying the City Council majority.
But out of embarrassment, fealty to Reva for whatever reason, or discomfiture with the discerning Silverstein, councilpersons Karen Farrer, Mikke Pierson and Paul Grisanti apparently bonded together not to release the report, a public document paid for by the city and completed six months ago.
It is obvious that the report apparently finding that Silverstein’s interactions with Feldman were reasonable requests in the pursuit of city business and not harassments (as defined in the city’s Administrative Guideline No. 3.4.6), had backfired on Reva who not coincidentally then was seeking a lucrative payoff from the city. She did eventually receive it, gratis the council.
The flawed argument for not releasing the report has been that it violates Reva’s departure agreement with the city, which includes a non-disparagement clause.
However, upon readings by learned attorneys and informed others, the agreement specifically (clause 10.2) does not prevent “either party from referring to or republishing the official findings of an agency.”
When questioned, the city’s attorney, John Cotti, replied that he did not have authority to unilaterally release the report. To do that apparently would take a majority of the Council, which to date has declined to do so.
It did however recently release the flawed disparate report investigating alleged corruption, as well as its damning 472 page Appendix of Interviews, that included litany of self-serving and spurious comments by Farrer and Pierson.
Another feeble argument against releasing the report concerning Silverstein is that Feldman would sue the city.
This presumed threat was dismissed as highly improbable by experienced attorneys and knowledgeable others, who noted not only that such a suit in the course of mutual discovery would expose Feldman’s questionable tenure as City Manager, including possibly corruption, but also how her suing her former employer might stand with possible future employers.
And besides the ignorance of municipal protocols, the City not releasing the report itself was seen as a clear indication of Farrer, Pierson and Grisanti’s petty hostility to Silverstein, and an abuse of transparency and public trust.
To that end, the city should then also consider releasing the 17-page complaint plus 100 pages of exhibits filed against Feldman by Silverstein that triggered not an investigation and a conceivable censure or worse, but rather an irresolute letter from her personal attorney claiming “harassment,” and threatening litigation while also proposing a payout.
It was that presumptuous letter that prompted the woeful majority to request the investigation that now haunts them, and whose intransigencies if anything prompt censure.
Hopefully, the municipal costs and embarrassments the inept trio has caused Malibu will be remembered if they arrogantly dare run for reelection.
But enough of high school politics. It is time Malibu residents look forward to an adult Council.
January 6, 2022

About Author

malibudailynews


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Twitter
Editor in Chief, Cece Woods

Malibu Daily News Editor in Chief Cece Woods started The Local Malibu, an activism based platform in 2014. The publication was instrumental in the success of two ballot measures, and seating three Malibu City Councilmen in 2016, and the top two vote-getters again in 2020.

During the summer of 2018, Woods exposed the law enforcement cover-up in the Malibu Creek State Park Shootings, and a few short months later provided the most comprehensive local news coverage during the Woolsey Fire attracting over 1 million hits across her social media platforms.